<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Indefual.ca</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.indefual.ca/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.indefual.ca</link>
	<description>Indefual's Own .Ca</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 20:02:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tenuous Bible Arguments by Ron Minick</title>
		<link>http://www.indefual.ca/?p=7&#038;cpage=1#comment-116809</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Minick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 20:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indefual.ca/?p=7#comment-116809</guid>
		<description>It appears to me that the 10 COMMANDMENTS are very clear!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It appears to me that the 10 COMMANDMENTS are very clear!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Queen as Symbol by John</title>
		<link>http://www.indefual.ca/?p=133&#038;cpage=1#comment-115060</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 04:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indefual.ca/the-queen-as-symbol#comment-115060</guid>
		<description>Its time to start acting like a country.To have are own voted representatives, not someone born into the position from another country. Its time to clear house and hand out some pink slips, no severance. Boot the bitch out. Long live Canada.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its time to start acting like a country.To have are own voted representatives, not someone born into the position from another country. Its time to clear house and hand out some pink slips, no severance. Boot the bitch out. Long live Canada.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Queen as Symbol by Free Québec</title>
		<link>http://www.indefual.ca/?p=133&#038;cpage=1#comment-104843</link>
		<dc:creator>Free Québec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 18:05:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indefual.ca/the-queen-as-symbol#comment-104843</guid>
		<description>Fcuk the Queen, Down with Monarchy, the only thing it symbolizes aside greed, is total enslavement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fcuk the Queen, Down with Monarchy, the only thing it symbolizes aside greed, is total enslavement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Queen as Symbol by James</title>
		<link>http://www.indefual.ca/?p=133&#038;cpage=1#comment-88812</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 14:41:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indefual.ca/the-queen-as-symbol#comment-88812</guid>
		<description>Of course the Queen is symbolic of the United Kingdom. The rest of your statement, Mikail, is pure bunk; Elizabeth II is very obviously a symbol of other nations on earth (I don&#039;t, however, know of any off of earth). This gets us back to the central issue of symbolism: it is not just monarchists who see the Queen as a personification of the state, the government does as well; from the Department of Canadian Heritage: &quot;In our constitutional monarchy the sovereign personifies the state and is the personal symbol of allegiance, unity and authority for all Canadians.&quot; Obviously this concept makes the Queen similar to a flag in the sense that she acts as a symbol, but the difference between the two lies in what kind of symbols they are. One is inanimate and soulless, while the other is a living being that we can speak to and who can answer us back. She also, unlike a flag or some other such thing, has a role in our governance - in fact, she is the governor - and when Canadians look at her they can be reminded that they have, and have had, a stable state and continuous government. She is also specific; when one says &quot;The Queen&quot;, everyone knows exactly what is being talked about. &quot;Canada,&quot; on the other hand, is ill-defined, what does it mean? &quot;Canadians&quot;, similarly, is a vague concept. There are many symbols of Canada, we all know, I&#039;m sure, what they are. But for the purposes of symbolism she serves, the Queen is the best fit. Let beavers and mounties symbolise the country, sure, but when it comes to matters of symbolising the state, a move to anything else would be a move to the inferior.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course the Queen is symbolic of the United Kingdom. The rest of your statement, Mikail, is pure bunk; Elizabeth II is very obviously a symbol of other nations on earth (I don&#8217;t, however, know of any off of earth). This gets us back to the central issue of symbolism: it is not just monarchists who see the Queen as a personification of the state, the government does as well; from the Department of Canadian Heritage: &#8220;In our constitutional monarchy the sovereign personifies the state and is the personal symbol of allegiance, unity and authority for all Canadians.&#8221; Obviously this concept makes the Queen similar to a flag in the sense that she acts as a symbol, but the difference between the two lies in what kind of symbols they are. One is inanimate and soulless, while the other is a living being that we can speak to and who can answer us back. She also, unlike a flag or some other such thing, has a role in our governance &#8211; in fact, she is the governor &#8211; and when Canadians look at her they can be reminded that they have, and have had, a stable state and continuous government. She is also specific; when one says &#8220;The Queen&#8221;, everyone knows exactly what is being talked about. &#8220;Canada,&#8221; on the other hand, is ill-defined, what does it mean? &#8220;Canadians&#8221;, similarly, is a vague concept. There are many symbols of Canada, we all know, I&#8217;m sure, what they are. But for the purposes of symbolism she serves, the Queen is the best fit. Let beavers and mounties symbolise the country, sure, but when it comes to matters of symbolising the state, a move to anything else would be a move to the inferior.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Queen as Symbol by Mikail</title>
		<link>http://www.indefual.ca/?p=133&#038;cpage=1#comment-81768</link>
		<dc:creator>Mikail</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 14:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indefual.ca/the-queen-as-symbol#comment-81768</guid>
		<description>The Queen has and always will be a symbol of the United Kingdom. Not and never any other nation on earth.
As for those who use the United States as an example of &quot;bad government&quot;, I have one answer: Athens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Queen has and always will be a symbol of the United Kingdom. Not and never any other nation on earth.<br />
As for those who use the United States as an example of &#8220;bad government&#8221;, I have one answer: Athens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on People who talk a lot by tamia</title>
		<link>http://www.indefual.ca/?p=47&#038;cpage=1#comment-75035</link>
		<dc:creator>tamia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 14:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indefual.ca/?p=47#comment-75035</guid>
		<description>Non-stop talking is about using others for attention and approval because of not giving oneself enough attention and approval.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Non-stop talking is about using others for attention and approval because of not giving oneself enough attention and approval.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on People who talk a lot by tamia</title>
		<link>http://www.indefual.ca/?p=47&#038;cpage=1#comment-75034</link>
		<dc:creator>tamia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 14:40:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indefual.ca/?p=47#comment-75034</guid>
		<description>Generally, people who talk too much don&#039;t think before they speak</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Generally, people who talk too much don&#8217;t think before they speak</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Civil Rights Roundup by Natassia Malthe</title>
		<link>http://www.indefual.ca/?p=107&#038;cpage=1#comment-59617</link>
		<dc:creator>Natassia Malthe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 12:31:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indefual.ca/?p=107#comment-59617</guid>
		<description>Hi there...I Googled for american civil war, but found your page about Civil Rights Roundup...and have to say thanks. nice read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there&#8230;I Googled for american civil war, but found your page about Civil Rights Roundup&#8230;and have to say thanks. nice read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Best Science Fiction Movie by psikeyhackr</title>
		<link>http://www.indefual.ca/?p=68&#038;cpage=1#comment-43635</link>
		<dc:creator>psikeyhackr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 22:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indefual.ca/?p=68#comment-43635</guid>
		<description>Of course it can be argued that The Matrix trilogy is better than The Abyss due to greater depth of plot, if not water, but The Abyss contained some real science in it so it wins on that criterion.

psik

PS - There were no comments in two years so I figured you needed two.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course it can be argued that The Matrix trilogy is better than The Abyss due to greater depth of plot, if not water, but The Abyss contained some real science in it so it wins on that criterion.</p>
<p>psik</p>
<p>PS &#8211; There were no comments in two years so I figured you needed two.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Best Science Fiction Movie by psikeyhackr</title>
		<link>http://www.indefual.ca/?p=68&#038;cpage=1#comment-43634</link>
		<dc:creator>psikeyhackr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 22:25:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indefual.ca/?p=68#comment-43634</guid>
		<description>This is incredible!

None of those lists had

The Abyss

This planet must be destroyed.

psik</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is incredible!</p>
<p>None of those lists had</p>
<p>The Abyss</p>
<p>This planet must be destroyed.</p>
<p>psik</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
